Lindisfarne Gospels British Library
Received wisdom on the grant for the Lindisfarne Gospels usually it was manufactured in Lindisfarne, that will be a monastery in Northumbria on a tidal island labeled as Holy Island from the north-east coast of The united kingdomt. It is often thought that it was made most likely in 698 CE to celebrate the translation associated with the relics of St Cuthbert to the large altar at Lindisfarne. Cuthbert had been the monastery's many prominent saint, that has died in 687.
The main reason behind this having already been regarded as the situation - and I also think it's the situation, although I would personally vary because of the dating-is the truth that some 250 years roughly later a priest known as Aldred put into the Latin Gospel text an interlinear gloss, a translation, in Old English. Aldred had accompanied the monastic community of St Cuthbert at, we think, Chester-le-Street (that they had already been forced to keep Lindisfarne by Viking attacks) in which he included the Old English as part of his work of establishing himself in the neighborhood. Into the colophon he states which he saw this as completing the work regarding gospels, and he attempts to connect that really work and validate it by providing the names of the who he, and presumably town, thought had made the book originally.
Aldred claims it was written and illuminated by Eadfrith, who was Bishop of Lindisfarne from 698 to 721. He says that guide was sewn collectively and actually limited by their successor as Bishop, Ethilwald. In which he states the metalwork within which it had been included had been created by Billfrith the anchorite.
We don't know much about Billfrith as an anchorite, a hermit. He's instead shrouded in secret, though it is interesting that Cuthbert himself had a prominent profile as a hermit too. However the various other two, Eadfrith and Ethilwald, are very well attested. Many historians will say that you may not just take at face price something added 250 years later. Having said that, it is sensibly at the beginning of the provenance history of the Gospels however it is not totally conclusive by itself.